Multi-author papers reveal a bizarre math problem: authors’ contribution estimates add up to about 140%.
Multi-author papers reveal a bizarre math problem: authors’ contribution estimates add up to about 140%.
More from this video
See all →In a group experiment, a randomly assigned leader consistently received an extra cookie despite no…
A NASA astronaut simulation weighted skill 95% and luck 5%, yet selected astronauts averaged a…
In many years, 40% of top-tier hockey players were born in the first quarter, versus 10% in the…
People who explained a good event through their own qualities donated 25% less to charity than…
Being born in Burundi, where gross national income per person is roughly $730 yearly, sharply…
People overestimate their share of fights and messes too, so this bias is not just about looking…
After gaining status partly through chance, people often interpret that status as deserved and its…
People respond more favorably to successful entrepreneurs who credit luck than to entrepreneurs…
Don't lose this one
A free account saves insights like this to your Boards, and Korva resurfaces them so you actually remember.