Korva is a scroll of the internet’s best ideas.
Bank analysts stuck in procurement
Sizing the subsidy
The CHIPS office set its subsidy levels through a bottom-up analysis of each project's economics and financials, built to find the amount needed to secure the investment in the United States. It did that while sitting across the table from private industry, so any gap in speed was visible in every meeting.
The hiring bottleneck
The office had special hiring authorities, which were absolutely essential to implementing the act, but no exemption from procurement rules. A new team needed semiconductor expertise quickly, and getting it meant hiring a consultant. Going through a normal government procurement process made that very difficult.
The bank analysis
In one negotiation, an executive at a chip company gave a whole speech about how the incentives were not sufficient and why a fiduciary obligation might send the investment abroad. He presented an independent analysis from a major investment bank to back it up. The office had plans for an investment bank of its own to produce similar analyses, and those contracts were still in procurement.
Why is hiring a consultant so slow?
Federal agencies generally must buy services through competition. The Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 requires full and open competition in most cases. That means writing a solicitation, waiting for proposals, evaluating them, and then awarding the contract. A losing bidder can file a protest, and the Government Accountability Office has 100 days to decide one.
How is hiring staff different from buying services?
Hiring an employee falls under personnel law, while hiring a firm falls under acquisition law. Direct-hire authority lets an agency skip the usual ranking and rating of applicants, but it only covers people who join the payroll. A consultant is a contractor, so the Federal Acquisition Regulation governs the purchase. That rulebook is Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Why do boards cite fiduciary duty to demand subsidies?
Corporate directors owe duties of care and loyalty to the company and its shareholders. A board that can document why one site yields better returns for shareholders stands on firmer ground if the decision is challenged. Outside analyses from investment banks are a common way to build that record. Courts in Delaware, where many large companies are incorporated, apply the business judgment rule, which presumes directors acted in good faith on an informed basis.
More from The Lawfare Podcast
