Korva is a scroll of the internet’s best ideas.
Brains skip the boring forecast
The unremarkable outcome
A flight will probably leave on time and be unremarkable, and that is statistically the likeliest scenario. The brain asks what if the plane crashes. A date will probably be pleasant, with a little learned on both sides and a decision about whether to meet again. The brain asks what if they think you're awkward, what if there's no chemistry, what if you embarrass yourself.
Why drama wins
Dramatic stories are easier to remember, and memorable dangers helped ancestors survive, so the brain is drawn to them. That is how one unexplained symptom becomes a serious illness, an awkward silence becomes evidence that someone dislikes you, and one mistake at work becomes the beginning of the end of a career. Every ordinary possibility gets skipped on the way to the worst one imaginable.
A normal emotion
Anxiety is a normal human emotion. Every successful entrepreneur has wondered whether the business would fail, and every parent has imagined something happening to their child. A mind that never imagines the worst is not the goal. The goal is a mind that no longer mistakes imagined futures for inevitable ones.
Why does flying feel scarier than driving?
Paul Slovic's 1987 paper Perception of Risk in Science reported that people rate risks higher when they seem dreaded, uncontrollable, and catastrophic. Plane crashes fit all three descriptions, since many people die at once and passengers have no control over the outcome. Car crashes tend to be rated lower on those scales even though they cause far more deaths overall.
Did avoiding planes after 9/11 cost lives?
Psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer analyzed road fatality data after the September 11, 2001 attacks. He estimated that roughly 1,500 additional Americans died in road crashes in the following year, as travelers who avoided flying drove instead. His analysis was published in 2004 in Psychological Science.
Why do people ignore probabilities?
Legal scholar Cass Sunstein named this probability neglect in 2001. When an outcome is emotionally vivid, people focus on how bad it would be and give little weight to how likely it is. In a 2001 experiment by Yuval Rottenstreich and Christopher Hsee, people were far less sensitive to changing odds when the outcome was an electric shock than when it was a monetary loss.
More from On Purpose with Jay Shetty
