Korva is a scroll of the internet’s best ideas.
Disappointment isn't someone else's fault
Disappointment as accusation
The accusation arrives as the parent having ruined the whole night, or as proof that real care would mean one more show. It looks almost harmless in a five-year-old and is not harmless in a twenty-year-old. Every child feels disappointment, and it ends up as one of two things: his own feeling, which he eventually sees he can manage, or evidence that someone wronged him and now owes him relief.
Holding the boundary
A parent holds the boundary with fewer words than feels natural. Shaming a five-year-old for entitlement doesn't help, and neither does giving in until the feeling disappears, since that keeps the pattern going. A short reply that names the feeling underneath does the work, along the lines of acknowledging that he wishes the answer were yes and that he's disappointed. Nothing more. The child probably won't agree, and the parent doesn't use that reaction as a gauge of whether it needed saying.
Where it shows up later
Later the same pattern turns up where no one owes a boy anything. A group text stops being funny. A girl he has been flirting with, who texted something close to a promise of sex that night, changes her mind. No one owes a boy continued humor, and no one owes boys, or the men they become, the fulfillment of their sexual desire. A boy owes other people the ability to tolerate his own disappointment without turning it into entitlement.
Why does naming a feeling calm it?
In a 2007 study in Psychological Science, Matthew Lieberman and colleagues at UCLA used brain imaging to show that putting feelings into words reduced activity in the amygdala. The same task increased activity in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, a region involved in regulating emotion. The researchers called the technique affect labeling. Participants labeled emotional faces, and the effect showed up without any instruction to calm down.
Why does frustration turn into blame?
In their 1939 book Frustration and Aggression, John Dollard, Neal Miller, and colleagues proposed that blocked goals produce aggressive impulses. Later work by Leonard Berkowitz revised the idea, finding that frustration produces negative feeling, and that cues in the situation and beliefs about who is at fault shape what people do with it. A person who sees the block as someone's deliberate act responds with more anger than one who sees it as chance. Attributions of blame are a central part of how anger forms.
Why does giving in make demands grow?
Psychologist Gerald Patterson described coercive family processes in his 1982 work at the Oregon Social Learning Center. When a child escalates and a parent gives in, both are rewarded: the child gets the result, and the parent gets relief from the noise. Each side learns to repeat the pattern, and the demands tend to rise over time. Patterson's research tracked these exchanges through direct observation of families in their homes.
More from Good Inside with Dr. Becky
