Korva is a scroll of the internet’s best ideas.
Joking about history shows confidence
1066 and All That
1066 and All That, a book from the 1930s, is an irreverent take on British history, particularly English history. A historian of the Revolution borrowed the idea for the title of his introductory essay in a 2026 volume: 1776 and All That.
The title fight
An editor at the University of Virginia Press pushed back, because nobody would get the reference. He kept the title, and the overall editor backed him.
Irreverence and confidence
Britain can make fun of its own history. The United States treats its foundational moment in 1776 very seriously, and a bit of irreverence is necessary, partly because the habit signals confidence in one's national history and national identity.
How did 1066 and All That mock British history?
W. C. Sellar and R. J. Yeatman published it in 1930 as a parody of a school textbook. It sorts English history into Good Things and Bad Things and mocks the way schoolchildren remember only scraps of dates and kings. The book grew out of humorous pieces the two men had written for Punch. It has stayed in print for generations.
Why does Britain mock its history so freely?
Britain has a long satirical tradition, including Punch magazine, which began in 1841. Monty Python and the Holy Grail, released in 1975, lampooned the Arthurian legend. The television series Blackadder ran from 1983 and set its jokes in the historical past. Terry Deary's Horrible Histories books debuted in 1993.