Korva is a scroll of the internet’s best ideas.
Was there a moment of joy?
Why the question works
Lying in bed reviewing the day, a parent can think of a peer problem at school, a body that is changing, a kid who is still hitting on the playground. Any moment that is not happy becomes proof that the kid isn't happy, that maybe the parent isn't either, and that the parent messed it up. Joy is momentary anyway, so one moment is enough to answer yes.
Joy in the mess
The moments of joy are almost always in the mess. The milk spills, and something funny happens while it gets cleaned up. Dry pasta gets thrown, and all of a sudden there is a pasta fight. It had to be dry, because with marinara sauce it wouldn't have been as funny. The same days held fights and a bad grade on a test, and the pasta fight still counts.
Looking back at hard times
A joyful day doesn't need to be a perfect one. A companion exercise works on the long scale: remember a really difficult time and look for the moment the light broke through. Then the next time life feels like it is bottoming out, with that scrambly, scared feeling of going down, part of the panic is slightly calmed by the knowledge that joy turns up wherever a person goes.
Why does the brain fixate on bad moments?
Psychologists call this negativity bias. In a widely cited 2001 review, Roy Baumeister and colleagues concluded that bad events have a stronger effect than good ones across a wide range of psychological domains. A plausible reason is that missing a threat once costs far more than missing a pleasure once. Bad moments also tend to get replayed and analyzed longer than good ones.
Why are spills and messes so often funny?
Peter McGraw and Caleb Warren proposed the benign violation theory of humor in 2010. It holds that people laugh when something seems wrong or threatening and, at the same moment, seems safe. A spilled drink or a flying noodle breaks the order of a tidy table without any real harm. In their experiments, laughter appeared when both conditions were met together.
Why do single moments shape how we remember?
Daniel Kahneman and colleagues described the peak-end rule in a 1993 study. Participants held a hand in painfully cold water twice, once for a shorter time and once for longer with the water warmed slightly at the end. Many chose to repeat the longer trial because it ended less painfully. People tend to judge an experience by its most intense moment and its final moment, not by its total length.
More from Good Inside with Dr. Becky
